Contact

Reaching the right resource at the right moment is the difference between a useful answer and a dead end. This page outlines how to get in touch with the fantasyhistorydata.com editorial and research team, what kinds of inquiries get handled here, and what a realistic response timeline looks like. The scope covers data questions, corrections, partnership inquiries, and research collaboration — not platform-specific fantasy app support, which belongs with the platform providers themselves.

Response expectations

Most editorial inquiries receive a response within 3 business days. That window stretches to 5 business days during the NFL Draft period (late April) and the first two weeks of September, when inbound volume roughly doubles compared to the off-season baseline. Research and data licensing questions may take up to 10 business days depending on the specificity of the request.

A few notes on what determines response priority:

1. Data corrections — Reports of factual errors in historical scoring figures, ADP tables, or player stat categories are treated as the highest priority. These go directly to the editorial queue and are reviewed before other inquiry types.
2. Research and academic collaboration — Universities or independent researchers studying fantasy sports participation, roster construction behavior, or scoring format trends should identify their institutional affiliation in the initial message. This routes the inquiry appropriately.
3. API and data integration questions — These are handled by the technical team. Questions about accessing structured historical data, export formats, or compatibility with third-party tools are best directed with as much specificity as possible — what sport, what date range, what format. A vague "can I get the data?" takes longer to answer than "I need NFL WR receiving stat history from 2010 through 2023 in CSV format."
4. General site feedback — Typos, broken links, formatting issues, and navigation suggestions go into a weekly review batch. They are read, even when a response is not sent.
5. Advertising and sponsorship inquiries — Reviewed on a rolling basis. Unsolicited bulk outreach from SEO agencies is filtered automatically.

The one category that consistently does not receive a useful response: requests to help with a specific live fantasy league decision. The how-to-get-help-for-fantasy-history-data page exists precisely for that — it points toward the communities, tools, and reference material that can actually help in real time.

Additional contact options

For readers who prefer to start with self-service before sending a message, the fantasy-history-data-frequently-asked-questions page covers the 30 most common questions about how historical data is sourced, how scoring formats are defined, and what the differences are between dynasty and keeper league data structures.

The glossary-of-fantasy-history-data-terms resolves most terminology questions — what counts as a "standard" scoring format, how half-PPR is calculated, what ADP actually measures — without needing to wait for a reply.

For data methodology questions specifically, the historical-data-accuracy-and-reliability page details the sourcing standards, reconciliation process between platform exports and official league stats, and known limitations in pre-2000 data sets where record completeness drops substantially.

How to reach this office

The primary contact method is email. The address is verified in the site footer and on the legal/privacy pages maintained by the publishing template. For data correction submissions, including the specific page URL and the exact figure believed to be incorrect speeds up the review process considerably — "the 2018 PPR WR1 ADP is wrong" takes three times longer to investigate than a message that names the player, the platform, and the cited number.

Physical correspondence is not processed at this time. Phone support is not offered — the research and editorial team is small (fewer than 10 contributors), and synchronous communication at scale is not operationally practical.

Social media direct messages are monitored but not used for formal inquiries. A message sent via a social platform may receive an acknowledgment, but substantive replies happen through email.

Service area covered

Fantasyhistorydata.com covers historical data across the four major North American professional fantasy sports verticals — football, baseball, basketball, and hockey — plus daily fantasy sports formats. The geographic scope is the United States, meaning the underlying professional leagues (NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL) and the US-based daily fantasy operators (DraftKings, FanDuel) that generate the performance history documented here.

The site does not cover:

• International football (soccer) — Fantasy Premier League, La Liga fantasy, and equivalent formats are outside scope.
• College sports fantasy — NCAA statistical history is not tracked here; the data structures, eligibility rules, and transfer-related discontinuities make reliable longitudinal comparison impractical.
• Esports fantasy — A separate and growing category, but not one addressed in this reference set.
• Prop betting history — Adjacent to fantasy data but governed by different sourcing standards and legal considerations. The historical-vegas-lines-and-fantasy-correlations page touches on the overlap where it's analytically relevant, but this site is not a gambling data resource.

For readers whose inquiry falls outside these boundaries, the honest answer is that a more specialized resource will serve better. The data-sources-for-fantasy-history page lists the primary external databases and APIs that cover adjacent categories, which may point toward the right destination faster than waiting for a response here.